Doing energy science work to heal is different than what you’ve been exposed to as you’ve wandered through the matter science world of medicine and nutrition This is because it does its science differently but its recommendations are at least grounded on a system of thinking that spans thousands of years, not just decades This approach to IC(interstitial cystititis….bladder pain syndrome), IBS, GERD, fibromyalgia, chronic prostatitis, and vulvodynia exposes us to a different way of thinking
Rumor has it that there is no specific diet for IC That’s true if the only diet you’ve been exposed to is based on fad We hear the term “fad diets” these days but what constitutes a diet as fad? The origins of the word “fad” comes from different sources and some are interesting; a hobby or pet project, from the early 1800’s; perhaps 18th century term, fiddle faddle, implying fashion or craze; from the French, fadaise meaning trifle or nonsense; unltimately from the Latin, fatuus meaning stupid
Whatever, we don’t take a fad seriously A passing fancy as implied But currently a fad is only a fad after we have experienced that there is no truth in its approach I would purport that a nutritional fad is grounded on the following:
No test of time to establish validity or that it actually helps with IC(is there still confusion in the ranks of IC patients?)
Guidelines are based on hearsay (Mary said that this was bad for her IC and corroborated by many other IC patients in a survey)
Based on a particular food(certain fruit, berry etc)
Based on a type of food(carbohydrate, protein)
Elimination of food types until there is nothing left to eat
Based on measurement(number of calories consumed, number of pounds lost)
Intuitively claims cannot be believed(in six weeks you’ll lose 30 pounds!)
No nutritional system supports the overall process(employing scientific concepts…..not molecular information)
This first and last guideline are the most salient because(and this seems like heresy) they place our current matter science nutritional model as suspect as fad
Why? Because there is no nutritional system that supports the underlying tenets of its dimension Therefore I would have to term our current molecular nutritional system as fad and I believe that’s why we fall for all the fad diets; we don’t have a system of nutrition that isn’t fad
How in the world could we know the difference between what is quality and real and fad when we have only been exposed to fad?
If you’ve read my books you’ll understand that nutrition is different than diet Nutrition focuses on how food qualities lead to disease Stay with me here Just because this may sound confusing doesn’t mean it should be discounted As the phrase goes, “how’s what you’re doing with diet working for you?” The energy science says that nutrition should take into account who the consumer is What a concept! You mean if I’m a Pitta Vata my food choices would be different than a Pitta Kapha?
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox
Join other followers
Leave a Reply